The Learning Professional - March 2006

                           Continuing Education for Technical Professionals

   THE LEARNING PROFESSIONAL

                                                                 Career Advancement Tips

                                                                                                      Volume 4, Issue 2

In This Issue:

AuxTipsTM

The Negotiation Mentor

Tips from Preston Michie about "Getting too Focused on Your Bottom Line."

 

Course Schedule

 

The Key to Effective Conflict Resolution

Chris Sheesley's advice about focusing on interests rather than positions.

 

Hope Springs Eternal: Up-and-Coming Techies Look Ahead

What some Oregon State University MIS students think about the IT profession.

 

QuickQuotes

Anyone need some change?

                                                                                   About Us | Contact | Privacy

AuxTipsTM

Quick tips you can start implementing immediately.

 

Tip1

A simple view of leadership is to provide good direction and influencewith integrity. Someone who is a strong leader could occasionally get poor results for various reasons. One reason is when the agenda isn't quite right. With good intentions and the team being led whole-heartedly buying into the agendathat agenda may not be what's best for the company or the customer.

 

If the input a team is getting from customers isn't crystal clear, the challenge for the team is to make progress and deal with ambiguity while maintaining a positive attitude. The burden of asking a lot of questions falls on the teamespecially the team leader since that person is most accountable for the results. Don't blame customers in situations of ambiguity, regardless of how uncooperative they appear to be.

 

Tip2

Tip 1 says "don't blame customers." That doesn't mean "the customer is always right." Providing good customer service means that those of us providing sales or service must act as responsible experts. Simply asking customers "what do you want?" and providing exactly what they say is not good service if we, as the experts, know there is a better solution.

 

Example: You need new shoes that will prevent foot pain and head to your favorite shoe store. You enter the store and immediately spot some really cool looking expensive shoes and tell the sales person you'd like to try them on.  Would you like the sales person to sell you those shoes or do you want her to take time to understand your foot condition and then sell you less expensive, nice looking shoes that will reduce pain more effectively than the shoes that first grabbed your attention?

 

  Send this email to a colleague


The Negotiation Mentor

Tips from Preston Michie, Principal, Team Soup, LLC

Getting Too Focused on Your Bottom Line

I always encourage participants in my negotiation seminars to do their homework before negotiations begin to determine their bottom line. Based on their research, I advise them to determine the price at which they will walk from the deal—and then walk out when the price falls below your bottom line, a tactic that often helps close deals at or above their bottom line. In sum, before you engage know your B.A.T.N.A. (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement). After all, if you can get a better price somewhere else, why continue to negotiate?

But I’ve noticed over the years that establishing a bottom line sometimes leads people to intentionally design their concession strategy to do little better than their bottom line, thinking they have done well. The problem with this perfectly acceptable strategy is that you may leave money on the table. Your bottom line is the point at which you should walk; it should not limit your upside potential. Further, this strategy assumes that the other side values things the same way you do, which is not always the case.

You can sometimes do better simply by opening more optimistically than you normally would and haggling longer to try to get a better price. The strategy calls for (1) opening optimistically, (2) waiting to see how the other side reacts, (3) pushing back on their counter offer by complaining about it, and (4) then conceding slowly.

You should expect push-back on extreme offers. If there is no push-back, either: (A) you have insulted the other side with your aggressive offer, and the negotiations have ended; in this case, you are not likely to get a deal unless you change strategy, (B) you are dealing with a rube (not likely), or (C) something else is going on—if you suspect so, you should slow down and ask questions to learn more before proceeding. Push-back, even if delivered in strong language, means engagement—you should interpret push-back to mean the negotiations are on.

If the other side rejects your offer, wait for a counter offer before modifying your position. Do not bargain against yourself by modifying your offer in reaction to push-back, even if it’s a flat out no. No matter what, wait for a counter offer before making another concession. And then push-back on the counter offer before conceding to a fallback position.

As the negotiations proceed, concede slowly, and make progressively smaller concessions. Make your goal to do significantly better than your bottom line. If your strategy fails, a deal can still be salvaged. You can always fold to your bottom line if you must to get an acceptable deal and avoid having to start over with someone else. But you should not fold to your bottom line until you have determined—by asking for more and testing the response with your own push-back and counters—that you can do no better.

Courses that build negotiation skills:

Fundamentals of Successful Negotiation       Onsite       Public Calendar

Building Negotiation Skills

Special Topics in Negotiations

  Send this email to a colleague


Course Schedule

 

Featured Courses:

 

Applying Emotional Intelligence to Critical Business Projects

2-Day Workshop

Building Influence and Project Leadership Skills

1-Day Workshop

Effective Meetings

1/2-Day Workshop

Essential Skills for Technical Professionals 2-Day Course

2-Day Workshop

Leadership Skills for Engineers and Technical Professionals

1-Day Workshop

Leading Technical Professionals

1-Day Workshop

Managing Many Priorities

1-Day Workshop

Peer Mentoring: A Practical Approach to  Knowledge Transfer

1-Day Workshop

People Management for Project Managers

1-Day Workshop

Progressive Teambuilding

1-Day Workshop

 

Most of these seminars are only available privately, at customer facilities.

 

Call 800-577-3528 for more information.

 

Complete course list

 

  Send this email to a colleague

 

Events:

 

Managing Learning Strategies for Your Organization

May 19 - Portland, OR

 

Upcoming Public Seminars:

 

Business Writing for Technical Professionals

April 27 - Portland, OR

Commitment and Enthusiasm: Every Leader's Challenge

April 13 - Portland, OR

Fundamentals of Effective Negotiation

April 20-21 - Portland, OR

May 18-19 - Anaheim, CA

June 1-2 - Los Angeles, CA

Leadership Skills for Engineers and Technical Professionals

April 26 - Santa Clara, CA

May 3 - Los Angeles, CA

May 4 - Anaheim, CA

May 9 - Portland, OR

May 11 - Bellevue, WA

Peer Mentoring: A Practical Approach to Knowledge Transfer

March 29 - San Jose, CA

June 1 - Austin, TX

June 2 - Houston, TX

June 6 - San Jose, CA

June 7 - Anaheim, CA

People Management for Project Managers

May 25 - Portland, OR

Progressive Teambuilding

May 23 - Portland, OR

Project Estimating and Planning

May 2 - Anaheim, CA

Stand and Deliver: Effective Technical Presentations

May 11 - Portland, OR

 

Complete Schedule: March - July 2006

 

  Send this email to a colleague

 


The Key to Effective Conflict Resolution

by Chris Sheesley, Principal, In-Accord, Inc.

 

Effective conflict resolution requires people to focus on their genuine interests, rather than their positions. For example, I may be opposed to my co-worker’s frequent use of e-mail when she communicates with me. My position is not because I don't like e-mail, but rather because I prefer direct and honest communication. I might feel that my colleague is using e-mail in a way that undermines our good working relationship. My real interest is in maintaining a positive, communicative workplace and relationship with this person. Rather than attacking her use of e-mail, a preferred strategy in this situation is to help my co-worker to understand my interest in direct communication.

 

Equally important, I should strive to understand that her reasons for using e-mail might also be valid (e.g. to be efficient, to be “polite” rather than confrontational, to share information with many people at once, etc.) so we might gain insight into each other’s points of view. Further, I may even change my position and support the use of e-mail in certain situations. If I had simply argued with my co-worker and labeled her use of e-mail “insensitive and lazy,” she may never have understood my legitimate, positive interests. As it was, by focusing on interests, we have a chance to address the real issues and make e-mail useful for both of us.

 

The deeper magic of exploring interests is that we may discover that we hold several interests in common. For example, we might find that we both want to be polite, respectful and have a common passion for the mission of our organization. Taking positions prematurely prevents open and creative dialogue. It also stands in the way of effective listening. By focusing on interests, people can develop agreements that meet everyone’s needs.

 

Think of a conflict in which you have been involved. List the positions taken by different sides. Then list what might be some underlying interests that inspired the positions.

 


 

Chris Sheesley is a professional mediator, and is author and instructor of the Conflict Resolution Skills for Technical Staff workshop.

 

  Send this email to a colleague


Hope Springs Eternal: Up-and-Coming Techies Look Ahead

by Susan de la Vergne                                                       Read Full Text

 

At Oregon State University recently, standing in front of a group of mostly seniors in the Management Information Systems program, I found myself saying things that were quite encouraging about the IT profession.

 

“One of the best things about being an Information Technology professional is that, during your career, you can work in a variety of industries.  You’re not locked in to just one type of business.  In my 25-year career, I’ve worked in banking, retail, higher education and utilities.”

 

I was there to offer them career counsel, tips and techniques to find – and land – a job.  Click here to read the complete article.

 


QuickQuotes

 

"If you don't like something, change it.  If you can't change it, change your attitude.  Don't complain."
~Maya Angelou

 

"Become a student of change.  It is the only thing that will remain constant."
~Anthony J. D'Angelo

 

"Your current safe boundaries were once unknown frontiers."
~Unknown


Contacting Us

 

For more information about Auxilium, please visit our web site by clicking here.

 

The Learning Professional is available via e-mail on a complimentary subscription basis.  If you think you've received this email in error or do not wish to receive future emails from us, you may unsubscribe by scrolling to the end of this email and following the instructions.

 

Questions about document transmission or editorial comments? Contact feedback@auxilium-inc.com.

 

Visitors may use the information contained in this e-newsletter by placing the following credit line:

    "This article is used by permission from Auxilium's complimentary monthly e-newsletter 'The Learning Professional' available at www.auxiliumtraining.com"

This information cannot be used for resale in any manner.

 

Copyright 2006, Auxilium, Inc.

 

10260 SW Greenburg Rd.

Suite 400

Portland, OR  97223